Read changes together.
Compare pressure and moisture records with relevant visual observations. Keep alternative explanations visible.
Give separate building signals
a shared context.
A pressure drop, a wet sensor and a camera observation may describe one developing issue. Heimdall is being developed to bring that evidence together before your team decides what it means.
Pilots under development
The starting point is the equipment you operate today. Available interfaces, exports, permissions and timing quality determine what a pilot can connect.
Compare pressure and moisture records with relevant visual observations. Keep alternative explanations visible.
Bring door, motion and camera observations into one sequence. Check authorisation against the appropriate records.
A wrong clock or missing source can change the interpretation. Make those gaps part of the review.
Choose a scenario. Inspect an observation to see why it is included or held outside. Remove a source and see how the situation changes.
Move left to see the picture before all observations are available.
This browser-only demo uses pre-authored synthetic observations and transparent rules. A group requires at least two different source types in the same defined area, within 30 seconds from first to last observation and with known clock uncertainty no greater than ±2 seconds. Manual reports are context. No real sensors, AI services or building systems are connected. Association does not establish a shared cause.
Bring representative building data, known timing and source limitations, and a question worth investigating. Together, we can define a focused pilot and agree what useful evidence would look like.
Development-stage product · Synthetic demonstrations · Compatibility assessed per pilot01 A clearly defined question
02 Existing sources and permission to use them
03 Timing, location and source-quality checks
04 Human review and agreed evaluation criteria